Prediction of Anouk Koevermans [182nd] vs Julieta Estable [497th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W L W L L
Form
W W L L W L L L L LHead-2-Head: Koevermans 2 - 0 Estable
They have played 4 sets in total, with Koevermans winning 4 and Estable winning 0. The last match between Koevermans and Estable was at the W75 Vacaria, 25-03-2025, First, Clay with Anouk Koevermans getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anouk Koevermans | 2 |
| Julieta Estable | 0 |
| Koevermans | Stats | Estable |
|---|---|---|
| 47% (8-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 17% (1-5) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 182 | Ranking | 497 |
| 179 | Highest Rank | 297 |
| 21 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 5 |
| 61% (153-98) | Career Total W/L | 60% (276-185) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Koevermans VS Estable H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Julieta Estable
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Julieta Estable
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
||||
Koevermans VS Estable H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 3 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:9:36 | Average Match Time | 1:9:36 |
| 74% (61/82) | 1st Serve % | 70% (57/81) |
| 79% (48/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (24/57) |
| 52% (11/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (6/24) |
| 50% (10/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 63% (51/81) | Return Points Win % | 28% (23/82) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Anouk Koevermans vs Julieta Estable Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Koevermans 2 - 0 Estable
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Koevermans has won 41.85% of points on their second serve, while Estable has won 38.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Koevermans, in recent form, has won 48.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Estable has won 48.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.45% and 36.83% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Koevermans has saved 55.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Estable has saved 48.2% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Koevermans has won 65.33% of matches played (W/L 49/ 26), with Estable winning 45.83% (W/L 22/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Koevermans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Estable has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 165), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 22/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Koevermans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.12% of matches (W/L 49/ 24), where as Estable has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.18% of matches (W/L 19/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Koevermans winning 2 times and Estable being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Koevermans winning 4 and Estable winning 0. The last match between Koevermans and Estable was at the W75 Vacaria, 25-03-2025, First, Clay with Anouk Koevermans getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Koevermans and Estable have played a deciding set 0 times, with Koevermans winning 0 times and Estable 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Koevermans winning 0, and Estable 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Koevermans has played against opponents with an average rank of 324.2 while Estable has played against players with an average rank of 475.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Koevermans has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Estable has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Koevermans has converted 43.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Estable has converted 55.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Anouk Koevermans vs Julieta Estable Best Odds For The Match
Anouk Koevermans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Eala
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Anouk Koevermans
75%
(
98 of
131)
1st Serve %
72%
(
96 of
134)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
96)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
54 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
134)
134
Total Points Won
131
|
7-6(4) 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Julieta Estable
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Anouk Koevermans
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Julieta Estable
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Anouk Koevermans
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
8
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Karina Miller
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Ella Seidel
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Anouk Koevermans
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Julieta Estable Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Camila Romero
Player
Julieta Estable
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
76%
(
61 of
80)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Julieta Estable
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Julieta Estable
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Candela Vazquez
Player
Julieta Estable
80%
(
59 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luisina Giovannini
Player
Julieta Estable
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
83%
(
39 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
50%
(
17 of
34)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
9 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
24 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julieta Estable
Player
Lourdes Ayala
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
36%
(
20 of
55)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Luisina Giovannini
Player
Julieta Estable
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julieta Estable
Player
Sol Ailin Larraya Guidi
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julieta Estable
Player
Marian Gomez Pezuela Cano
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Koevermans vs Estable?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Koevermans Vs Estable is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (153/98) | Win/Loss | 60% (276/185) |
| 59% (339/234) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (603/437) |
| 54% (2856/2438) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4969/4264) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 351 | Aces Total | 164 |
| 0.53 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1371 | Total Double Faults | 622 |
| 1:33:48 | Average Match Time | 1:9:27 |
| 402.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 515.15 |
| 61% (9049/14743) | 1st Serve % | 69% (13330/19423) |
| 62% (5595/9049) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (7604/13330) |
| 40% (2259/5694) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2752/6093) |
| 51% (1068/2104) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1351/2805) |
| 49% (7312/14872) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9703/20033) |
| 61% (152/250) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (273/456) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (29/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (39/73) |
| 53% (38/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (69/123) |
| 87% (156/135) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (272/238) |
| 13% (156/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (272/33) |
| 19% (95/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (189/37) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
